Rubens’s Elevation of the Cross Makes Weight Visible Across Three Panels
A rising diagonal organises a monumental religious image, while the side panels give the central action a wider human setting.
Rubens, Elevation of the Cross, central panel (c. 1610). Photo: Alvesgaspar, 2015. Unmodified. Photo · CC BY-SA 4.0
An Event Built Around an Incline
The central action in Rubens’s Elevation of the Cross is a change of position. The cross has not yet become a stable vertical form. Bodies push, brace and pull around it, making the movement feel difficult and unfinished. The diagonal gathers those separate efforts into one direction. A religious subject is given an immediate physical problem: how weight is moved, and what that effort requires of the people involved.
Rubens’s forearm and torso studies offer comparisons for muscular effort. Neither is presented here as a preparatory drawing for the Elevation of the Cross.
Rubens, Anatomical Studies (c. 1600–05). The Met, Rogers Fund, 1996. Collection · CC0
Rubens, Study of the Torso Belvedere, verso (1601–2). The Met, Purchase, 2001 Benefit Fund, 2002. Collection · CC0
The Antwerp Cathedral’s record identifies the triptych as oil on panel and gives the central section a height of 460 centimetres. Each side wing shares that height. The scale helps explain why the arrangement reads as an encounter rather than a small illustration. Individual gestures contribute to a structure much larger than the person looking at it.
The Fall of Phaeton provides a separate example of Rubens arranging bodies around opposing forces: falling rather than lifting.
Rubens, The Fall of Phaeton (c. 1604/1605; reworked c. 1606/1608). Courtesy National Gallery of Art, Washington, Patrons’ Permanent Fund. Collection · CC0
The Side Panels Change the Central Action
The work should not be reduced to the central group. The cathedral’s interpretation draws attention to the different responses distributed across the wings, including the presence of Mary and John. Their relationship to the event is not the same as that of the figures handling the cross. Physical participation, witness and grief occupy connected but distinct areas of the image.
Master of the Starck Triptych, Raising of the Cross (c. 1480/1490). Courtesy National Gallery of Art, Washington, Patrons’ Permanent Fund. Collection · CC0
Those differences keep the triptych from becoming only a display of bodily power. An act performed at the centre has consequences beyond the people carrying it out. The eye can move toward the witnesses, then return to the rising diagonal with another understanding of the scene. The hinges divide the object, but they do not make its human relationships independent.
The Virgin Adored by Saints is a separate altarpiece design. It appears on the opposite side of the torso-study sheet reproduced above.
Rubens, The Virgin Adored by Saints, recto (1597–1640). The Met, Purchase, 2001 Benefit Fund, 2002. Collection · CC0
A Reproduction Also Has a Medium
The National Gallery of Art holds Jan Witdoeck’s engraved interpretation after Rubens. Its record identifies a print made across three joined sheets, rather than the original painted panels. The distinction is useful when encountering the composition in reproduction. An engraving translates coloured paint into systems of line and tone, preserving some relationships while changing the means through which they become visible.
Witdoeck translates Rubens into engraving; Baldung’s 1507 woodcut is an earlier, independent treatment of the raising of the cross.
Jan Witdoeck after Rubens, Elevation of the Cross (1638), engraving. Courtesy National Gallery of Art, Washington, Andrew W. Mellon Fund. Collection · CC0
Hans Baldung Grien, Raising of the Cross (1507). Publisher: Ulrich Pinder. The Met, Gift of Junius S. Morgan, 1919. Collection · CC0
Comparing media can sharpen attention without treating one image as a substitute for the other. In the painting, colour participates in the distribution of bodies and light; in the print, the density and direction of marks must carry that work differently. Across both, the rising cross remains a powerful organising line. Rubens makes movement intelligible through resistance: the object’s weight is felt through the bodies arranged around it, and the event’s gravity through the witnesses who cannot stop it.
Comments