Millais’s Ophelia Makes the Setting Impossible to Ignore
John Everett Millais painted Ophelia in 1851–52, taking his subject from Shakespeare's Hamlet. Tate's account identifies the work as an oil painting and emphasises the detailed natural setting surrounding the tragic figure.
A familiar literary source can make it tempting to treat the picture as a scene already understood. Yet the painting changes the conditions of the story. It gives the eye time to move through a setting that a spoken account or a performance would encounter differently.
Begin away from the figure
Spend a moment with the surrounding vegetation before returning to Ophelia. Ask how much attention the setting demands and whether that demand changes your experience of the central subject.
This is not an invitation to forget the tragedy. It is a way to examine the tension between close natural observation and the event represented within it.
Distinguish detail from a symbolic checklist
Flowers in the painting have been discussed through symbolic associations, and Tate identifies several examples. Such references can enrich a reading, but a picture is more than a series of objects waiting to be translated.
Consider how a plant's position, shape or colour participates in the arrangement before assigning it a meaning. The same detail can work pictorially and symbolically, and neither role needs to erase the other.
Notice what a still image permits
A painting allows the viewer to remain with one moment. That duration belongs to the encounter with the work, not to the unfolding of the fictional event.
Ask how your attention moves between the figure and the setting over time. Does one part become harder to look at after another has been examined? Does the balance change when the literary story returns to mind?
Ophelia can be approached as an adaptation rather than a transparent illustration. Millais's choices determine how the story becomes visible and what the viewer is invited to notice. The painting's continuing force lies partly in the fact that its beauty and its tragic subject do not settle into a simple, comfortable relationship.
Sources
Ophelia: painting, study and historical comparisons
The full, framed view of Millais’s painting appears at the opening of this article. The first three images below show his preparatory head study, Stephenson’s later print after the painting and Delacroix’s separate treatment of the Hamlet episode. The six additional works provide comparisons: four other interpretations of Ophelia, followed by Millais’s The Blind Girl and Portia, which depict different subjects. These additions are not preparatory studies for the Tate painting, and their inclusion does not imply undocumented influence.
Image credits
1. John Everett Millais, Ophelia, 1851–52. Tate, London, presented by Sir Henry Tate 1894, N01506. Photograph by Sailko, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_everett_millais,_ofelia,_1851-52,_01.jpg. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. The original source photograph is unretouched. The header shows an automatically cropped detail; the complete framed view appears below the title. Photograph licensed by Sailko, not a Tate image license. No endorsement by the photographer or collection is implied.
2. John Everett Millais, Ophelia – Head Study, 1852, 1906P664. Birmingham Museum & Art Gallery. Photo by Birmingham Museums Trust, CC0. Source: https://dams.birminghammuseums.org.uk/assetbank-birminghammuseums/action/viewAsset?id=15532. License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. Original source photograph used without crop or retouch; responsive display only. The museum's official preview is used at a modest display size. No endorsement by the photographer or collection is implied.
3. James Stephenson, after John Everett Millais, Ophelia (Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 4, Scene 7), 1 March 1866. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, The Elisha Whittelsey Collection, The Elisha Whittelsey Fund, 1949, 49.40.282. Open Access, CC0. Source: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/368061. License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. Original source photograph used without crop or retouch; responsive display only. No endorsement by the photographer or collection is implied.
4. Eugène Delacroix, Death of Ophelia, 1843. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Harris Brisbane Dick Fund, 1928, 28.92.8. Open Access, CC0. Source: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/337110. License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. Original source photograph used without crop or retouch; responsive display only. No endorsement by the photographer or collection is implied.
5. Victor Müller, Ophelia, ca. 1869. Städel Museum, Frankfurt am Main; 1386. Public Domain. Source: https://sammlung.staedelmuseum.de/en/work/ophelia. Institutional image-use policy: https://sammlung.staedelmuseum.de/en/concept. The museum identifies the image as Public Domain and refers to the Public Domain Mark: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/. A separate interpretation of Ophelia, not a preparatory study for Millais’s painting. Complete source image, without crop or retouch; no institutional endorsement is implied.
6. Norbert Gœneutte, Ophélie (femme aux longs cheveux), 1882, second state. Paris Musées / Musée Carnavalet - Histoire de Paris; G.14306. CC0. Source: https://www.parismuseescollections.paris.fr/fr/musee-carnavalet/oeuvres/ophelie-femme-aux-longs-cheveux. License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. A separate print of Ophelia, included as a comparison rather than a preparatory study for Millais’s painting. Complete source sheet, including inscriptions, collection marks and margins, without crop or retouch; no institutional endorsement is implied.
7. Paul Steck, Ophélie, 1894–1895. Paris Musées / Petit Palais, musée des Beaux-Arts de la Ville de Paris; PPP3697. CC0. Source: https://www.parismuseescollections.paris.fr/fr/petit-palais/oeuvres/ophelie. License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. A later interpretation of Ophelia, not a preparatory study for Millais’s painting. Complete source image, without crop or retouch; no institutional endorsement is implied.
8. Alice Pike Barney, Ophelia, ca. 1909, pastel on paper. Smithsonian American Art Museum; Gift of Laura Dreyfus Barney and Natalie Clifford Barney in memory of their mother, Alice Pike Barney; 1971.456.7. Public Domain, identified by the institution as Unrestricted (Public Domain). Source: https://americanart.si.edu/artwork/ophelia-1300. A separate interpretation of Ophelia, not a preparatory study for Millais’s painting. Complete source sheet, with its light paper margins, without crop or retouch; no institutional endorsement is implied.
9. John Everett Millais, The Blind Girl, 1856, 1892P3. Birmingham Museum & Art Gallery. Photo by Birmingham Museums Trust, CC0. Source: https://dams.birminghammuseums.org.uk/assetbank-birminghammuseums/action/viewAsset?id=3114. License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. A separate subject, included here to compare Millais’s treatment of figures within a landscape; not a preparatory study for Ophelia. Complete source image, without crop or retouch; no institutional endorsement is implied.
10. Sir John Everett Millais, Portia, 1886. The Metropolitan Museum of Art; Catharine Lorillard Wolfe Collection, Wolfe Fund, 1906; 06.1328. CC0. Source: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/437092. License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. Portia is a character from The Merchant of Venice. This later work provides a comparison with Millais’s treatment of another Shakespearean role, not a preparatory study for Ophelia. Complete source image, without crop or retouch; no institutional endorsement is implied.
Comments